<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Equivalence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.equivalence.co.uk/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk</link>
	<description>Technical Blog for Software Developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:16:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on does your employer suck? by Gregg</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1686/comment-page-1#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1686#comment-700</guid>
		<description>Hi Colin,

Yeah I had looked at the BizSpark thing in the past. It is a very good deal. My only concern with it is that overheads with SQL Server when the grace period comes to an end. I&#039;ve been working with Ruby and Mysql quite a bit recently in work and I&#039;m (gradually) thinking it&#039;s a pretty cool combination. That said, I&#039;m thinking about doing stuff with the matching algorithms, and when it comes to things like that it&#039;s more in the field of C#. Or maybe even a little Scala - just can&#039;t bare to go down the Java route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Colin,</p>
<p>Yeah I had looked at the BizSpark thing in the past. It is a very good deal. My only concern with it is that overheads with SQL Server when the grace period comes to an end. I&#8217;ve been working with Ruby and Mysql quite a bit recently in work and I&#8217;m (gradually) thinking it&#8217;s a pretty cool combination. That said, I&#8217;m thinking about doing stuff with the matching algorithms, and when it comes to things like that it&#8217;s more in the field of C#. Or maybe even a little Scala &#8211; just can&#8217;t bare to go down the Java route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on does your employer suck? by Colin Gemmell</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1686/comment-page-1#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Gemmell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1686#comment-699</guid>
		<description>I know how much you love microsoft, but I thought it was worth mentioning there BizSpark and WebSpark programs. Essentially you get 3 years free access to a lot of stuff that microsoft put out for developers plus you get teamed with another company who can help with everything from hosting projects to business advice etc.

Not a bad deal if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know how much you love microsoft, but I thought it was worth mentioning there BizSpark and WebSpark programs. Essentially you get 3 years free access to a lot of stuff that microsoft put out for developers plus you get teamed with another company who can help with everything from hosting projects to business advice etc.</p>
<p>Not a bad deal if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on academics don&#8217;t care and industry doesn&#8217;t have the time by Mark Dalgarno</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1501/comment-page-1#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dalgarno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1501#comment-636</guid>
		<description>As a Lisp developer it&#039;s pretty depressing that &#039;mainstream&#039; languages still haven&#039;t caught up with what we&#039;ve had in Common Lisp since the early 90s. I *am* excited by greater interest in functional programing languages, particularly Clojure which has many of Lisp&#039;s features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Lisp developer it&#8217;s pretty depressing that &#8216;mainstream&#8217; languages still haven&#8217;t caught up with what we&#8217;ve had in Common Lisp since the early 90s. I *am* excited by greater interest in functional programing languages, particularly Clojure which has many of Lisp&#8217;s features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on idiot&#8217;s guide to linux on amazon ec2 &#8211; part 1 by idiot’s guide to linux on amazon ec2 – part 2 &#124; Equivalence</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1521/comment-page-1#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>idiot’s guide to linux on amazon ec2 – part 2 &#124; Equivalence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1521#comment-607</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 1 I covered how to remove the root login, create a new user, and add this user to the list of sudoers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1 I covered how to remove the root login, create a new user, and add this user to the list of sudoers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on idiot&#8217;s guide to linux on amazon ec2 &#8211; part 1 by alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1521/comment-page-1#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1521#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Nice post!  We have also just been through this with our own AMIs.  It would be great to &#039;compare notes&#039;.  See http://www.rabbitmq.com/ec2.html if you are interested.

Cheers,

alexis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post!  We have also just been through this with our own AMIs.  It would be great to &#8216;compare notes&#8217;.  See <a href="http://www.rabbitmq.com/ec2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rabbitmq.com/ec2.html</a> if you are interested.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>alexis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 ways to write beautiful code by 2008年国外最好Web设计、开发技巧、脚本以及资源总结 &#124; 小卡在线</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/101/comment-page-1#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>2008年国外最好Web设计、开发技巧、脚本以及资源总结 &#124; 小卡在线</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=101#comment-592</guid>
		<description>[...] 10个优化技巧 所有网站都应具备的10个SEO元素 编写赏心悦目的代码的7种方法 10个CSS简写技巧让你永远受用(已翻译成中文) 10个Web开发小技巧 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10个优化技巧 所有网站都应具备的10个SEO元素 编写赏心悦目的代码的7种方法 10个CSS简写技巧让你永远受用(已翻译成中文) 10个Web开发小技巧 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on idiot&#8217;s guide to linux on amazon ec2 &#8211; part 1 by idiot’s guide to linux on amazon ec2 &#8250; ec2base</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1521/comment-page-1#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>idiot’s guide to linux on amazon ec2 &#8250; ec2base</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1521#comment-585</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1521 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1521" rel="nofollow">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1521</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on academics don&#8217;t care and industry doesn&#8217;t have the time by Gregg</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1501/comment-page-1#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1501#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Well said Peter. Now what did I do with that Jetpac of mine......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Peter. Now what did I do with that Jetpac of mine&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on academics don&#8217;t care and industry doesn&#8217;t have the time by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1501/comment-page-1#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1501#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Aye its about time the boffins got there finger out,I thought computers and robots would be doing all the mundane stuff these days,and we would all have time to play with our Jetpacs and Time machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye its about time the boffins got there finger out,I thought computers and robots would be doing all the mundane stuff these days,and we would all have time to play with our Jetpacs and Time machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on academics don&#8217;t care and industry doesn&#8217;t have the time by Gregg</title>
		<link>http://www.equivalence.co.uk/archives/1501/comment-page-1#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equivalence.co.uk/?p=1501#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe, thanks for the comment, some good points.

True, we have seen a rise in dynamic languages over the last 10 years however dynamic typing was also present in Lisp. What we can definitely say is that it has now become easier to use such technologies in industry without too much stigma.

I did put some thought in about the availability of frameworks and how much they are pushing us forward. For sure, they now make it far easier for people to create apps quickly and, possibly, produce more reliable applications. However, are we missing the bigger picture somehow? If not, are we saying that programming languages as we know them are as evolved as they are going to be. This I&#039;m not sure about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe, thanks for the comment, some good points.</p>
<p>True, we have seen a rise in dynamic languages over the last 10 years however dynamic typing was also present in Lisp. What we can definitely say is that it has now become easier to use such technologies in industry without too much stigma.</p>
<p>I did put some thought in about the availability of frameworks and how much they are pushing us forward. For sure, they now make it far easier for people to create apps quickly and, possibly, produce more reliable applications. However, are we missing the bigger picture somehow? If not, are we saying that programming languages as we know them are as evolved as they are going to be. This I&#8217;m not sure about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
